{"id":852,"date":"2014-12-17T19:50:09","date_gmt":"2014-12-18T02:50:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ambriente.com\/blog\/?p=852"},"modified":"2014-12-17T19:50:09","modified_gmt":"2014-12-18T02:50:09","slug":"nicolas-dumit-estevez-interviews-ricardo-miranda-zuniga","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ambriente.com\/blog\/2014\/12\/17\/nicolas-dumit-estevez-interviews-ricardo-miranda-zuniga\/","title":{"rendered":"Nicol\u00e1s Dumit Est\u00e9vez Interviews Ricardo Miranda Z\u00fa\u00f1iga"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/ambriente.com\/ideology\/radioAK.jpg\" width=\"300\" alt=\"On Transmitting Ideology\" align=\"left\" \/>As part of the exhibition <a href=\"http:\/\/www.elmuseo.org\/playing-with-fire\/\" title=\"Playing with Fire at El Museo del Barrio\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;PLAYING WITH FIRE: Political Interventions, Dissident Acts, and Mischievous Actions&#8221;<\/a> at El Museo del Barrio several interviews were conducted with the artists concerning their practice.  Below is the interview that the curator Nicol\u00e1s Dumit Est\u00e9vez conducted with me for the exhibition.  The exhibition continues on view until February 7th.<br \/>\n<br \/>\n<strong>NDE:<\/strong> Can you talk about the use of firearms in On Transmitting Ideology?<br \/>\n<strong>RMZ:<\/strong> Through the amplification of mass media, ideological rhetoric is a powerful cultural weapon.  I wanted to make as transparent as possible the power of ideological speech and its transmission through the media; mounting the radios on to the forms of AK47s and Uzis immediately triggers this link &#8211; the transmission of ideological speech is a political weapon.<\/p>\n<p><strong>NDE:<\/strong>  I had the opportunity to see images of the performance of On Transmitting Ideology in Berlin, Germany.  What were some of the reactions from passersby? My understanding is that people in the streets encountered you, as well as a small cadre of performers carrying wooden AK47s? How did you go about recruiting  participants to your piece?<br \/>\n<strong>RMZ:<\/strong> The march was one act of a 24 hour sound performance titled \u201cMoving Forest\u201d that was commissioned for \u201ctransmediale.08: CONSPIRE\u2026\u201d an annual art and digital culture festival in Berlin.  The performance and call for participants was circulated during the festival, so it was festival participants that volunteered to be part of the performance.  The march of 20 participants was from Haus der Kulturen der Welt to the public park Siegess\u00e4ule  with a stop by the mayor\u2019s home. My constant fear was that of authorities stoping us, but police merely looked at us with disinterest.  Also most pedestrians merely paused to watch us, some asked what we were doing and when English speaking, we had them listen to the audio montage.  People who did so, generally understood the work and were only surprised by the extremism spoken in the historically famous speeches.<\/p>\n<p><strong>NDE:<\/strong> There is a great deal of debate between those who advocate for guns and those who want to ban them . I am wondering how On Transmitting Ideology may or may not position itself in the context of this push and pull.<br \/>\n<strong>RMZ:<\/strong> The representation of the gun is to reflect the violent nature of ideology and if one is to listen to the audio montage, it capture extremism.  I consider both violence and extremism as negative characteristics of society.  The reading of the work that is most in line with my goal in creating the work is that we as a society need to move away from both weapons and ideological extremisms &#8211; political and religious.  <\/p>\n<p><strong>NDE:<\/strong> What are your thoughts about the politization of aesthetics. It has come to my attention that, while it is fashionable to make \u201cpolitical\u201d work, politics are not a hip subject in the art world?<br \/>\n<strong>RMZ:<\/strong> I have little interest in the art world.  I\u2019m much more interested in art that exists outside of the art world; art that engages people who are not seeking art and may function outside the gallery or museum.  I\u2019m interested in art that attempts to weave itself into the fiber of everyday culture while investigating, questioning and perhaps critiquing normative culture to stir self reflection.  Much of the exchange in the art world is to decorate the homes of the wealthy or perhaps to serve as an investment for the wealthy.  Perhaps for the art collector, investing in work that portrays current day politics is a bad long-term investment choice and not the best home decoration.  If art world work is political, it needs to be sufficiently abstracted or undefined to function as a commodity object, so that any political potential has been muted.<\/p>\n<p><strong>NDE:<\/strong> Making political art work entails a big responsibility and a challenge as well. How can art that is politically-conscious live beyond the art world and effect change in society at large? And is this the role of the artist?<br \/>\n<strong>RMZ:<\/strong> This is a tough questions, because I don\u2019t know how one would measure the effect of politically charged work upon others whom it may inspire to act.  I believe that as long as the drive to create political art is sincere &#8211; that the artist is compelled to make political art due to first-hand experience of injustice, inequality, the misuse of power, it is not the role of the artist to effect change.  The role of the artist is to capture and convey.<\/p>\n<p>This interview is part of Crossfire, a project conceived and edited by Nicol\u00e1s Dumit Est\u00e9vez for El Museo del Barrio.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As part of the exhibition &#8220;PLAYING WITH FIRE: Political Interventions, Dissident Acts, and Mischievous Actions&#8221; at El Museo del Barrio several interviews were conducted with the artists concerning their practice. Below is the interview that the curator Nicol\u00e1s Dumit Est\u00e9vez conducted with me for the exhibition. The exhibition continues on view until February 7th. NDE: [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[503,58,2,3,116],"tags":[632,526,587,586,633,181],"class_list":["post-852","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-aesthetics","category-art-and-activism","category-critical_perspectives","category-fine_arts","category-politics","tag-ak47","tag-museo-del-barrio","tag-nicolas-dumit-estevez","tag-on-transmitting-ideology","tag-playing-with-fire","tag-ricardo-miranda-zuniga"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ambriente.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/852","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ambriente.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ambriente.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ambriente.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ambriente.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=852"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.ambriente.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/852\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":858,"href":"https:\/\/www.ambriente.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/852\/revisions\/858"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ambriente.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=852"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ambriente.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=852"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ambriente.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=852"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}